Inappropriate Structured Deposit is Inappropriate

“The joy of giving continues at UOB”, shouted the flier that Singapore’s second-largest bank stuffed through my letterbox earlier this week. It was a Christmas-themed advertisement for their latest structured deposit, the UOB Principal Guaranteed Structured Deposit: Growth Deposit – Series (11) – brackets and italics in original.

“Enjoy 7.5% Total Guaranteed Minimum Interest!” it blared, and you might think that was pretty great. But if you look in the fine print (which takes up two-thirds of the page), you’ll see it’s not a 7.5% interest rate – it’s a 1.26% interest rate over six years. By UOB’s standard, you could advertise “250% GUARANTEED INTEREST!”, and then point out in the fine print that it’s a 200-year deposit.

But that’s not the most egregious thing about this structured mumble swerve.

A further bullet-point touts the product’s “Up to 3.6% Potential Maturity Variable Interest”. You have to look down in the fine print again to find out what the variable interest’s based on and how it’s calculated, and it is a doozy…

The Maturity Variable Interest Rate shall be calculated as the product of (i) 1.2 and (ii) 5Y SGD swap rate minus 2Y SGD swap rate (i.e. 1.2 x {5Y SGD Swap Rate – 2Y SGD Swap Rate}) observed on the Observation Date. The minimum Maturity Variable Interest Rate is 0.75% and maximum Maturity Variable Interest Rate is 3.6%. The Maturity Variable Interest is payable only on the Maturity Date provided the whole Principal Amount is held with the Bank until Maturity.

Now, this might be just me… but I don’t know how many Singaporean aunties and uncles would want to get exposure to the 2y vs 5y SGD steepener. I don’t know how many aunties and uncles would know what a SGD steepener is.

And if you do the math on this product, it doesn’t seem very appealing at all. Your very-best-case scenario is that you get the full 3.6% payout after five years and eleven months; add that to the first five years of payments, and the equivalent interest rate works out to be almost bang on 1.75% for a six-year deposit.

Interest rates are low, but they’re not that low. You can go down the road to ICICI Bank’s Singapore branch and get 1.75% on a three-year term deposit, with a whole lot less lockup time.

So this product looks like a really bad deal for customers. It pays worse than a term deposit. It’s got a huge long lockup time. And it’s linked to something that customers won’t understand. What exactly are UOB trying to pull here?

This entry was posted in Money, Rant. Bookmark the permalink.